Appium and Maestro: documented facts side by side
Both tools document end-to-end tests. 5 of 9 fields differ. The comparison lists facts from each tool's own pages and does not rate either tool.
Field by field
| Field | Appium | Maestro | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licence | open-source | open-source | same |
| Hosting | self-hosted | cloud, self-hosted | differs |
| Test classes documented | End-to-end tests | End-to-end tests | same |
| Test languages | C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby | JavaScript, YAML | differs |
| CI integrations named in docs | not published | Bitbucket Pipelines, Bitrise, CircleCI, GitHub Actions | differs |
| Platforms | mobile, web | mobile, web | same |
| Published price | not published | from 0 USD per device per month | differs |
| First release | not published | not published | same |
| Vendor or maintainer | OpenJS Foundation | not published | differs |
Only on this page
Curated angle for this pair: languages and hosting.
The field with the largest difference is test languages: Appium lists C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby; Maestro lists JavaScript, YAML.
Questions
What is the difference between Appium and Maestro?
The field with the largest difference is test languages: Appium lists C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby; Maestro lists JavaScript, YAML.
What is Appium, and what is Maestro?
Appium: open-source, documents e2e. Maestro: open-source, documents e2e.
Which test classes do Appium and Maestro each document?
Appium: end-to-end tests. Maestro: end-to-end tests.
Are Appium and Maestro free?
Appium: open-source; price not published. Maestro: open-source; price from 0 USD.
Are Appium and Maestro open source or commercial?
Appium: open-source. Maestro: open-source.
What are the key differences between Appium and Maestro in hosting and CI integrations?
Appium: hosting self-hosted; CI integrations not published. Maestro: hosting self-hosted, cloud; CI integrations GitHub Actions, Bitrise, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI.